[sword-devel] Ubuntu 12.04 ....
dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu.com
Mon Apr 23 04:11:20 MST 2012
do not mix PPAs with official archive.
$ apt-cache policy bibletime
$ apt-cache policy xiphos
$ apt-cache policy libsword-dev
On 23 April 2012 09:57, Barry Drake <bdrake at crosswire.org> wrote:
> On 23/04/12 02:46, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> I wasn't aware, but you'll have to be more specific: What sort of
>> dependency conflicts? What does apt-get complain about?
> Specifically, the packages offered under 12.04 use libsword8 for BibleTime
> and libsword9 for Xiphos. If BibleTime is installed first, apt-get gives:
> ~$ sudo apt-get install xiphos
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> libgsf-1-114 libgsf-1-common libsword-common libsword9 xiphos-data
> Suggested packages:
> The following packages will be REMOVED
> bibletime libsword8
> The following NEW packages will be installed
> libgsf-1-114 libgsf-1-common libsword-common libsword9 xiphos xiphos-data
> 0 upgraded, 6 newly installed, 2 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B/5,108 kB of archives.
> After this operation, 5,543 kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
> Continuing (obviously) kills BibleTime. If the process is done installing
> Xiphos first, apt-get refuses to replace the later libsword with the earlier
> one and fails to install. It is clearly a packaging problem - we just need
> a packaged version of a later build of BibleTime.
> God bless, Barry.
> From Barry Drake (The Revd) Health and Healing advisor to the East
> Midlands Synod of the United Reformed Church. See
> http://www.urc5.org.uk/index for information about the synod, and
> http://www.urc5.org.uk/?q=node/703 for the Synod Healing pages.
> Replies - b.drake at ntlworld.com
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel