dmsmith at crosswire.org
Fri May 15 05:20:59 MST 2009
On May 15, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>> 2. We need to support http.
>> 3. We don't need to support the old, standard non-zipped directory
>> structure with http because it's not needed for backwards
> I think Troy's argument is right for module libraries, created by
> who do not have much nous - install sword and open up your repo (via
> +/- http). So HTTP support for standard repos is of huge benefit
> But other than that, yes, I agree with your post.
> I also think that the installation of local zip files (while
> programmatically not different to across the network) is not meant to
> break the general idea of how our repos (should) work.
Exactly. HTTP/FTP/FILE are all mechanisms of delivery. This is a
separate issue from how to handle a rawzip module that a user has
More information about the sword-devel