[sword-devel] FFe application for sword being considered, and patches split out
Troy A. Griffitts
scribe at crosswire.org
Sun Aug 30 21:50:54 MST 2009
Quick note: I remember scanning the patch originally sent seeing a 'new'
without an obvious delete. Please be sure to check for this. I may be
wrong; it was a quick observation.
I do appreciate and plan to incorporate Matthew's suggestions into svn
head. I believe I still may research clucene and see if we can use our
UTF-16 or 32 conversion routines so we won't need to allocate 1 meg of
static buffer. Considering all the comments recently about bc and index
versioning as well. We need to release a 1.6.1 soon and it should
contain most of these things.
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> I have split out three specific patches from Matthew's single larger
> patch, and tested what happens when I incorporate them in our sword
> packages. They all test out fine for me. Each one fixes a clearly
> present bug in the current packaged code.
> The three patch files are available for download at:
> Although they were made against the sword 1.6.0 tarball code by quilt,
> they apply cleanly against SWORD svn head (use patch -p1 <filename.diff
> to apply them by hand). I'd be happy to see them accepted into the
> official SWORD codebase.
> I did this work because I'm seriously thinking about trying for an FFe,
> so we can get these, plus a packaging change to re-enable module
> encryption and decryption (!), into Karmic.
> Anyone with objections, or anyone with suggested additional bugfixes
> that should go into such a package update, please speak up.
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel