[sword-devel] New SWORD website - update
Peter von Kaehne
refdoc at gmx.net
Sat Dec 27 16:31:20 MST 2008
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Limiting the possibilities is probably a good decision. The list should
> be carefully crafted. I think it should be based on the amount of
> modules and amount of users. Most languages have only one or two
> modules. How about giving only 4 languages: English, German, Ancient
> Greek (not modern as it is now!), Old Hebrew. The ancient languages
> could be bundled together, but is it too much work to create language
I have added all languages where we wither have several modules already
or have some in "waiting".
> I would like to see possibility to sort the list according to module
> type OR language. If I try to find all Finnish modules (hypothetical -
> there are only Bibles) I don't like browsing through several categories.
> Actually the browser Find function is the only easy way to find modules.
> I guess quite many people want to find all available modules for their
See above. If your language has several modules it should be in the list.
> There are many language names which my Firefox doesn't show correctly:
> Chinantec, Ozumac?n
> Are they really utf-8?
Answered last email.
> If the module is in Beta repository it should be marked explicitly.
Getting closer to it.
> The zip packages were discussed already. I think this should be changed:
> "Windows users should click on the link in the WINDOWS column, while
> Linux users should click on the link in the RAW Zip column."
> Instead it shoud be clearly stated that application module managers are
> preferred and some instruction given how to install using the zip files.
More information about the sword-devel