[sword-devel] Re: Re: Another typo fixed in PorAA
chrislit at crosswire.org
Fri Jun 3 16:56:16 MST 2005
The problem is that you and Dario Matos have a disagreement on what the
PorAA we are hosting is and whether it is copyrighted, corrupted, etc.
(see the thread you started on April 26th). I can't read Portuguese and
I don't have sufficient knowledge of the history of the Portuguese Bible
to know which of you is correct.
We know where we got the currently available PorAA module and we know
that its source says it is okay to distribute. That's why we are
distributing that one. But you are claiming that the one you are
providing is copyrighted by IBB, so we are taking your word on that, at
least until we can confirm otherwise.
Are you making any progress with IBB? Also, can you provide any kind of
proof that the old PorAA module is a corrupted version of the same
version you have provided?
Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corcete Dutra wrote:
> Em Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:47:10 +0200, Joachim Ansorg escreveu:
>>Chris asked me to take it offline until the copyright is clear.
> I fully understand, but then you should take it off line also
> from the main repository. It does little good to take a corrected
> beta version offline but maintain a corrupted one in the main server.
> I just wonder why I wasn't told that when I first raised the
> issue... perhaps I'd had pressed Imprensa Bíblica Brasileira more.
> Now it will be all but impossible for the next few weeks.
>>Mh, I don't know anything about GnomeSword's internals. I'd suggest
>>to report it to it's bug tracker.
> Will do.
More information about the sword-devel