[osis-core] <hi> types
Sun, 17 Aug 2003 11:48:02 -0400
Todd Tillinghast wrote:
>>weak emphasis that could be tagged. <hi> was designed for emphasis
>>indeterminate semantics. If we wish to encode this, we might as well
>>supply a few standard types so that everyone speaks the same language.
I am tempted to agree with Chris that standard types on <hi> would be
useful from the standpoint of people using the same terms.
The problem arises when you have foreign words in an English text, which
are generally written using italic. Do we allow people to take the easy
way out and simply say <hi type="italic"> so they get the same
presentation or make a judgment about what is meant by the presentation?
I favor the latter but it is always a judgment call of the encoder and
the purpose of the project.
>>>Aren't drop caps are usually a purely presentation related thing and
>>>don't need to be encoded.
>>See the above image for an example drop cap (the C in the right
>> In encoding manuscripts, I think we should have the ability to
>>identify these as special. But maybe this is considered too far
>>from our current mission.
Here I think Chris is voicing my concern that we be able to encode every
detail about a manuscript witness. Is it presentational? Sure, but with
manuscripts, things like upper/lower case, line/column/page breaks,
holes in the text (recording the physical dimension) are important.
I don't remember the name of the text right now but I had a class in
Israelite history that had us reading a number of Babylonian annuals,
etc. and the professor was emphasizing that you need to at least look at
images to evaluate the arguments of others. In this particular case,
there was a dispute about the text and one author had suggested a quite
long portion of text had been lost. Problem was that when you looked at
the image it was clear that anything beyond 3-4 letters (cuneiform
glyphs actually) was completely out of bounds. The author had suggested
2-3 complete words. That sort of information is very important in
> Is there a reason that they choose the large L and the drop cap C where
> they did. Like the start of a 'section', paragraph, etc...
> Do they start every page with an illuminated letter?
> Is your intent to preserve the formatting in the original rendering (in
> the same sense that we preserve the point where the column and page
> break was) OR is that you believe that the illuminated letter contains
> part of the 'meaning' intended by the author and by leaving out the fact
> that an illuminated letter was present would leave out part of the
> 'meaning'? (or both)
> On the second I am wondering if the illuminated signals the start of
> something and that the meaning might be preserved in some other way.
I would go with both. May not now know what the "meaning" of the letter
is, but if we encode all of them, then perhaps we can search to find a
pattern we have overlooked.
I would not preserve that sort of information for anything beginning in
the 19th century but at some point, people are going to probably want
that information as well. My only defense is that 19th century and after
printing is so uniform to not merit that level of detail. Weak argument
I know and betrays my interest in some texts and not others, but there
you have it.
Hope you are having a great day!
>>osis-core mailing list
> osis-core mailing list
Director of Research and Development
Society of Biblical Literature
Chair, V1 - Text Processing: Office and Publishing Systems Interface
Co-Editor, ISO 13250, Topic Maps -- Reference Model
Topic Maps: Human, not artificial, intelligence at work!