[bt-devel] BibleTime Search

Martin Gruner mg.pub at gmx.net
Wed Jan 4 02:03:14 MST 2006


Hi all,

> > I usually use Qt Designer to implement my GUIs then derive from the UIC
> > -generated class for my specific implementation class.  Is there a
> > reason that Designer wasn't used in BibleTime?  Would you be opposed to
> > me re-creating the new search dialog with Designer?
>
> I think Designer did not exist if BibleTime was created.
> I've never used QDesigner but t would be great if you could redesign the
> dialog using QDesigner.
> Go ahaead using QDesigner if you'd like to re-creating the search dialog.
> I guess the classes need a clean-up, anyway.

Yeah, sounds like a great idea!
Lee, with Designer, it is also possible to "code in forms", which eliminates 
the need for subclassing. Do you prefer subclassing for technical reasons?

Switching to Qt Designer is probably a good idea for other parts of BibleTime 
too, but that can come later.

> > Thanks for taking care of the indexing progress dialog.  Joachim is
> > tuning CLucene, so I'll look into fixing up the GUI and after that,
> > adding some sorting to the results...
>
> I looked into the sorting. If we call searcher.search() with INDEXORDER as
> second parameter (see indexedSearch()) the result will be ordered.
> But since CLucene has a bug this doesn't work. I submitted a patch to the
> team and the next version of CLucene will work with INDEXORDER.

Cool. Sounds like good OpenSource practice. =)

mg


More information about the bt-devel mailing list