[bt-devel] Icons work in new stable release, but not in CVS

[Steven P. Ulrick]

Hello, Everyone :)
I hadn't heard anything about this message I sent a week ago, so I
assumed that perhaps it might not have made it to everyone on the list. 
So here it is again.
On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 03:40:12 -0500
"Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 15:53:47 -0500
> "Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:49:42 -0500
> > "Steven P. Ulrick" <spu@faith4miracle.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 19:55:20 +0200
> > > Joachim Ansorg <junkmail@joachim.ansorgs.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > > > Hash: SHA1
> > > > 
> > > > Stephen,
> > > > thank you for your support!
> > > > 
> > > > You need
> > > > 	automake 1.7.2
> > > > 	autoconf 2.5.7
> > > > 	libtool 1.4.3
> > > > I hope that's all.
> > > > 
> > > > Joachim
> > > 
> > > Hello, Joachim :)
> > > I haven't tried to compile the first two items quoted above - I'll
> > > get those going shortly.  But while looking for libtool 1.4.3, all
> > > I could find was a SRPM.  At ftp://ftp.gnu.org, the closest full
> > > version I could find was 1.4.2.
> > > 
> > > These are the only references to 1.4.3:
> > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.2-1.4.3.tar.xdp.gz.back-RSN.README
> > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3-1.5.diff.gz.back-RSN.README
> > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3-1.5.tar.xdp.gz.back-RSN.README
> > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4.3.tar.gz.back-RSN.README
> > > 
> > > If the SRPM doesn't work, please let me know if you can
> > > help me get the source of libtool 1.4.3
> > > 
> > > Steven P. Ulrick
> > 
> > Hello, Joachim :)
> > Just got done compiling and installing the following:
> > autoconf-2.57
> > automake-1.7.2
> > libtool-1.4.3
> > 
> > The first two I got from ftp://ftp.gnu.org
> > The third, I got the gz file from the SuSE 8.2 SRPM, which is the
> > only libtool 1.4.3 I could find.
> > 
> > I then proceeded to get a fresh copy of Bibletime from the CVS.
> > Next, I manually removed the Bibletime icons that were installed
> > from the Bibletime 1.3 source tarball.
> > I then did the usual:
> > make -f Makefile.cvs
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr
> > make
> > su
> > make install
> > 
> > The result was that I still had no icons.
> > I have uploaded a tarball with the output from all four commands to
> > the following location:
> > 
> > http://www.faith4miracle.org/bibletime-CompileLogs.tar.bz2
> > 
> > You will be hearing from me in a few hours :)
> > Steven P. Ulrick
> 
> Hello, Joachim :)
> In reference to the above quoted message, please find the files:
> bibletime/pics/16x16/Makefile
> bibletime/pics/16x16/Makefile.in
> located in a tarball at the following location:
> 
> http://www.faith4miracle.org/BibletimePics-Makefiles.tar.bz2
> 
> Before I wrote this, I ran "rpm -e --nodeps" on every RPM on my system
> whose name began with "autoconf", "automake", or "libtools"  I then
> recompiled and reinstalled the source tarballs of the versions of
> these tools that you told me to install, ran "make distclean" on the
> Bibletime CVS and recompiled Bibletime using the same commands quoted
> above.  The result was that I still have no icons.  I do not mention
> this out of annoyance, of course, but purely in the interest of doing
> what I can to narrow this problem down :)
> 
> Again, if there's anything you need me to do, please feel free to let
> me know.  Also, to be on the safe side, I want to mention something I
> referred to recently that I heard no response about.  I assume I heard
> nothing because this isn't an issue, but here goes:
> The "version" of Red Hat 9 I am running is one I purchased from
> http://www.cheapbytes.com  It's actual name is "Pink Tie Linux", not
> "Red Hat Linux"  The only difference between "Red Hat" and "Pink Tie"
> is supposed to be that to stay in line with Red Hat's EULA, CheapBytes
> needed to remove all references to the "Red Hat" trademark.  If you
> say so, I will gladly have my brother Dave download "Red Hat 9" as
> opposed to "Pink Tie 9" just to see if possibly there are more
> differences between the two than there are supposed to be :)
> 
> Anyway, I think I can get a few more hours sleep now :)

> Steven P. Ulrick