[sword-devel] Alternate Versification question
thulester at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 09:17:04 MST 2012
Yes I found that to be true (CCELs versification was, by the authors own
admission, error ridden). Regardless, with a bit of work was able to
create one that wasn't, which the CCEL one helped validate.
On Thursday, August 9, 2012, Chris Little wrote:
> On 08/08/2012 07:05 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
>> Thanks Greg .. I've done that, and compared what comes with Sword to
>> what's listed here:
>> The only difference, as far as I was able to tell was canon_gnt.h does
>> not appear to ship with sword. I assume it was pruned or included
>> with others. Otherwise the contents appear the same.
>> I've found a verification here:
>> I'm going to try to create a canon_lxx.h myself - but what use is
>> that? If I successfully translate the CCEL LXX versification into a
>> canon_lxx.h file and submit it - does that actually help anything?
> I'll put a little time into a new versification system right now, but in
> general I would not accept any submissions of versification systems. CCEL's
> versification data, especially, is so error-ridden as to be worthless.
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sword-devel