[sword-devel] Alternate Versification question

[Andrew Thule]

Thanks Greg .. I've done that, and compared what comes with Sword to
what's listed here:
https://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/basicv11ns/

The only difference, as far as I was able to tell was canon_gnt.h does
not appear to ship with sword.  I assume it was pruned or included
with others.  Otherwise the contents appear the same.

I've found a verification here:
http://www.ccel.org/refsys/Bible.LXX.xml

I'm going to try to create a canon_lxx.h myself - but what use is
that?  If I successfully translate the CCEL LXX versification into a
canon_lxx.h file and submit it - does that actually help anything?

~A

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Greg Hellings <greg.hellings at gmail.com> wrote:
> Some have been pruned in the past because they were either duplicates
> or similar. It is also possible that some of the documentation is out
> of date. The best way to know for sure is to look at the installed
> header files, if you're on Linux, to see which ones are included. Each
> versification is listed in a header file with the name canon_<name>.h
>
> Modifications must also be made in a few others places once that file
> is in place. If the one you need isn't supported (I don't see LXX or
> GNT at present) then you're welcome to create such a file and submit
> it along with your module.
>
> --Greg
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Andrew Thule <thulester at gmail.com> wrote:
>> osis2mod -h lists the following versifications supported:
>>
>>   -v <v11n>              specify a versification scheme to use (default is KJV)
>>                                  Note: The following are valid values for v11n:
>>                                         Catholic
>>                                         Catholic2
>>                                         German
>>                                         KJV
>>                                         KJVA
>>                                         Leningrad
>>                                         Luther
>>                                         MT
>>                                         NRSV
>>                                         NRSVA
>>                                         Synodal
>>                                         Vulg
>>
>> However, this following page list others (such as LXX and GNT):
>> http://svn.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification/System_Identification
>>
>> I can see from this page that support for some of the versification
>> schemes appears to be a function of the development cycle with German,
>> Luther and Vulgate being added in 1.6.1 and Catholic and Catholic2
>> being added in 1.6.2:
>> http://svn.crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification#Supported_versification_systems
>>
>> Cutting to the chase, my question is this, are versification schemes
>> such as LXX and GNT to be expected in subsequent development
>> iterations or are there otherways to employ them?  I'm specifically
>> interested in LXX as I've got valid OSIS for LXXE, but I'm constantly
>> banging into versification errors/warning when I create my module
>> ie.
>> INFO(V11N): Hos.7 is not in the NRSVA versification. Appending content
>> to Hos.6.11
>> INFO(V11N): Tob.8 is not in the NRSVA versification. Appending content
>> to Tob.7.16
>> INFO(V11N): Tob.11 is not in the KJVA versification. Appending content
>> to Tob.10.12
>> INFO(V11N): Sir.30.27 is not in the KJVA versification. Appending
>> content to Sir.30.25
>> ERROR(REF): Invalid osisID/annotateRef: 4Macc.18.1
>> etc.
>>
>> ~A
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page