[sword-devel] KJV.conf and Project KJV2006 ?
Troy A. Griffitts
scribe at crosswire.org
Sun Dec 5 06:12:48 MST 2010
Well the logic behind the name was that the distinctness of our module was the inclusion of the interlinearization efforts of a large number of volunteers. Otherwise, I agree with DM that it should simply be the KJV1769. The date really has no significance. It was simply the easiest thing we could think of and had the bonus side effect of motivating the volunteers to finish in a year! But I would still like to keep the name as it gives us a name to point people to who want our unique interlinear data and honors the volunteers who did the laborious manual labor. Not that DM's laborious manual labor to update the markup isn't appreciated!
Hope that makes sense or at least gives you an idea of why I prefer the name stay unchanged.
"DM Smith" <dmsmith at crosswire.org> wrote:
>The KJV2006 effort was a cleanup. Troy wanted to retain the name
>KJV2003. I think KJV1769 might be a better name. But I'll leave it up
>On Dec 5, 2010, at 7:54 AM, David Haslam wrote:
>> KJV 2.4 is in the CrossWire beta repository.
>> As Project KJV2003 seems to have been removed from the CrossWire
>> the more important to update references in the KJV.conf file to
>> http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/ KJV2006 instead.
>> View this message in context:
>> Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
>Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the sword-devel