[sword-devel] GPL and other license related questions
dmsmith555 at yahoo.com
Sat Jan 26 06:53:06 MST 2008
On Jan 26, 2008, at 3:12 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>> On that subject
>> Free as in Freedom
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
> Sword and all works based on it, including all frontends, are licensed
> under the GPL v. 2 only and no other license or version of the GPL.
>> Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and freedom destroying. What
>> about other open source licenses like the Python license for example?
>> IANAL, but before I start a project I want to make sure I have the
>> freedom to develop open source as I believe is the most beneficial to
>> all. Has this been answered before?
> The only people who would consider the GPL "freedom destroying" are
> people who only care about their own freedoms and not those of others
> (i.e. selfish people). I don't think we care about their interests. We
> certainly don't have any interest in having our work exploited by the
> selfish, who would like to exploit our years of work for their own
> personal, possibly monetary, gain.
The other "freedom destroying" position is that GPL is incompatible
with some other licenses. At the GNU website, they maintain a lists of
licenses that are compatible or incompatible with V2 and also V3.
(These lists are different.) The upshot is that it may not be possible
to use Sword with any other third party code that is open source. It
may be that the licenses for Plone, Zope, Python, .Net,, C#, and other
contexts in which users want to use Sword, are not conducive to such
development. (I haven't looked)
I don't think we should change from the GPL, but I think we should
allow for having Sword on as many devices as possible.
Working together to spread His word, openly and freely,
More information about the sword-devel