[sword-devel] Names

Pierre Marc Dumuid pierre.dumuid at adelaide.edu.au
Mon Feb 12 05:08:59 MST 2007

My current convention is:

  ^   ^   ^          ^
  |   |   |          BookID at NCTM
  |   |   Book name 
  |   Author (Initials)

but, that's just me, (I'm, still developing them), and after the 
commentaries are done, and the licencing issues are worked out, then I 
was going to finalise it.


Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Eeli Kaikkonen <eekaikko at mail.student.oulu.fi> writes:
>> I have one objection: "Systematic Theology" is too common a name. The
>> module names should be differentiated from the start up.
> Well...  OK.  You don't find a problem with the Heretics or Orthodoxy
> module names?  They're not very well differentiated in 1 word, and
> Chesterton is surely not the only one to have written on those
> subjects.  What about Institutes?
> It could be renamed e.g. HodgeSysTheo, but there surely seems to be a
> strong bias in favor of really short module names -- consider the
> Pilgrim and Practice modules.
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

More information about the sword-devel mailing list