[sword-devel] Firefox front-end
djortley at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 10:26:18 MST 2007
Should we now discuss standardizing implementations? Are people in
favor of doing that?
On Dec 10, 2007 10:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <karl at kleinpaste.org> wrote:
> Daniel Blake <danblake at tcdr.com> writes:
> > Reading your post reminded me of a
> > discussion earlier this year. I searched and found the thread I
> > remembered. It talks about individually implemented Sword protocols.
> > GnomeSword - sword://
> > "GS understands "sword://ModuleName/KeyIntoThatModule" where the key
> > is obviously a verse reference for Bibles and commentaries, but just
> > as easily is a treekey for genbooks and lexdicts."
> GnomeSword does this for both sword:// and bible:// equivalently,
> implemented by creating needed GConf keys in /desktop/gnome/url-handlers.
> There has never been a standard defined for what should be done with
> sword:// and bible://, which created a vacuum to be filled by individual
> implementers, so we've each done something appropriate for our
> respective environments.
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel