[sword-devel] Firefox front-end

DJ Ortley djortley at gmail.com
Mon Dec 10 10:26:18 MST 2007

Should we now discuss standardizing implementations?  Are people in
favor of doing that?


On Dec 10, 2007 10:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <karl at kleinpaste.org> wrote:
> Daniel Blake <danblake at tcdr.com> writes:
> > Reading your post reminded me of a
> > discussion earlier this year.  I searched and found the thread I
> > remembered.  It talks about individually implemented Sword protocols.
> ...
> > GnomeSword - sword://
> > "GS understands "sword://ModuleName/KeyIntoThatModule" where the key
> > is obviously a verse reference for Bibles and commentaries, but just
> > as easily is a treekey for genbooks and lexdicts."
> GnomeSword does this for both sword:// and bible:// equivalently,
> implemented by creating needed GConf keys in /desktop/gnome/url-handlers.
> There has never been a standard defined for what should be done with
> sword:// and bible://, which created a vacuum to be filled by individual
> implementers, so we've each done something appropriate for our
> respective environments.
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

More information about the sword-devel mailing list