[sword-devel] Re: Applying for copyright maintainer - cease and
evangelinux at matheteuo.org
Thu Feb 17 18:07:29 MST 2005
---------- Original Message -------------
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Re: Applying for copyright maintainer - cease and
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:55:59 -0600
From: Chris Little <chrislit at crosswire.org>
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel at crosswire.org>
Don Parris wrote:
> ---------- Original Message -------------
> Subject: Re: Applying for copyright maintainer - cease and desist Re:
> [sword-devel] One thing That I would like to see...
> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 20:09:44 -0500
> From: "Bryan L. Fordham" <bfordham at socialistsushi.com>
> To: Sword Dev <sword-devel at crosswire.org>
> Daniel Glassey wrote:
>>If you have $10,000 and can guarrantee royalties then they may discuss
>>it with you - that is what Zondervan require. afaik Zondervan sell their
>>own software with the NIV so I don't think they will sell a sword module
>>themselves. There are more translations than the NIV so if Zondervan
>>don't want to distribute it for our software that is their choice. I
>>know there are commercial bible software people (Hi guys :) ) on this
>>list and afaiu they haven't had it easy dealing with Zondervan, so don't
>>feel too bad that we aren't going to get the NIV.
> I purchased the NIV and the NASB for use with The On-Line Bible for Windows a few years ago. Since I no longer run Windows, it does me no good. I do value the NIV tremendously, and cannot imagine why they would not make it available to us, if they made it available to the On-Line Bible and others. In my own estimate, such behavior is discriminatory and counter-productive for them. Of course, that's my own opinion.
I don't believe it is an issue of discrimination. (It might be if they
are trying not to add new licensees because they want to push their own
software, which I do not know to be the case. But I think your
suggestion here is that they are showing preferential treatment to other
outside vendors, e.g. OLB, so that's a different issue.) The problem
isn't that they would make CrossWire meet different standards from OLB
or Logos or BibleWorks or whatever. The problem is that we don't have
the facilities to meet the monetary & accounting requirements that they
have for all vendors. (I do acknowledge that Zondervan might have
differing licensing practices for different vendors; I'm just trying to
say that I don't think we could meet the requirements that we have been
told in the past exist.) Furthermore, it's a free country (I use that in
the rhetorical idiomatic sense and do not mean to falsely imply that
this applies only to Americans or that radical right-wing America is in
fact "free" by, say, 1789's standards) and Zondervan is free to
discriminate all they want, with regard to whom they choose to do
I'll buy that for $1.00. ;) I admit I walked into the thread without reading all of it.
> I would like to ask if the NASB is actually going to be available soon? I know that when I sumbitted an e-mail to their copyright office (early last year), I was informed that they had already agreed to make it available. I saw some posts about the NASB module, but don't know if that pertains to the developers getting it ready for release.
Gosh, we hope so. :) We need to get version 1.5.8 of the library
released, then BibleCS 1.5.8, since they are going to be needed for the
NASB. I'm supposed to finish up the NASB lexicons, and I should really
take a day off from writing my thesis to do this--maybe this weekend. I
think the NASB itself is finished and ready for sale as soon as all of
the other parts are ready.
If someone will post a release date I can write it up on OS Ministry's news portal. It would be good to know when the approval came through as well.
DC Parris GNU Evangelist
"Free software is like God's love - you can share it with anyone anywhere anytime!"
More information about the sword-devel