vimacs was Re: [sword-devel] Re: Christian Debian distro talk
chrislit at crosswire.org
Wed Apr 6 21:23:11 MST 2005
My only joke was in suggesting that the kernel is unnecessary. Of course
you need a kernel--how else will you run emacs? I would also push
strongly for the full (real) emacs. None of these micro-versions. And
definitely not Xemacs.
It's standard on... everything that comes on media larger than a floppy.
jpklingon at aol.com wrote:
> << For the non-native English speakers among us, Chris is joking (I hope
> ;) ). I think Joel might be as well.>>
> I cannot speak for Chris - I was being humorous in my emphasis (or
> intended to be so) but I am serious that emacs is a very good editor,
> and the one I personally require on Unix systems. Micro-Emacs or Emacs
> clones, like Zile, are good options, but if an emacs-like isn't on a
> system I always put it there. Full blown emacs may be too much for a
> very limited system, but I doubt it. It's standard on Knoppix - why
> leave it out?
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel