dictionaries (was: RE: [osis-core] issues unaddressed at the Dallas meeting)

[Chris Little]

Patrick,

Go ahead & post your findings.  I'm heading to Berkeley for most of the 
weekend and may be unable to access email until Sunday evening or Monday 
(unless I can get this cell phone dialup thing working).  I should have 
the time to finish a list of elements by then.  Seems like our content 
model for 1.5 core is going to amount to roughly, 
<entry><term>xyz</term><def>123</def></entry> anyway.  I recall ThML 
being similar, but Harry should correct me on that.

I find the simple model in core plus more specialized separate module to 
be a very agreeable plan.

Take care, everyone.

--Chris


Patrick Durusau wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Current thinking is a separate module. Did some work on it today but 
> will await your list of elements.
>
> Patrick
>
> Chris Little wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Todd Tillinghast wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>> One issue that I have not heard anything about since the Dallas meeting
>>> is the dictionary set of elements.
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Did we decide to spin dictionaries off as a separate module or keep that
>> in core?
>>
>> Either way, I think we should attempt to support easy conversion from
>> exported SIL LinguaLinks lexica since they represent a large body of 
>> work from one of our primary users.  I'll try to draw up a list of 
>> elements necessary to achieve this tonight.
>>
>> --Chris
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> osis-core mailing list
>> osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
>> http://www.bibletechnologieswg.org/mailman/listinfo/osis-core
>>
>>  
>>
>