Fwd: [Ichthux-devel] Lost Ichthux & the Cartoon Jesus

Raphaël Pinson raphink at gmail.com
Mon Apr 11 02:50:59 MST 2005


OK so I'll forward this private answer between Ben and me too...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raphaël Pinson <raphink at gmail.com>
Date: Apr 11, 2005 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: [Ichthux-devel] Lost Ichthux & the Cartoon Jesus
To: Ben Armstrong <synergism at gmail.com>



On Apr 10, 2005 7:55 PM, Ben Armstrong <synergism at gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> It is curious that you say you were aware of this issue, and yet you
> did not file a bug against the package in sid. Or perhaps you were
> aware, but didn't yet realize the issue was in sid too? :) In any
> event, I am not a KDE user on sid, so it isn't appropriate for me to
> file a bug. Please file one.


I will. Last week I reported quite a few bugs, and I hadn't thought about 
reporting this one, but I surely will ...

I'm not sure this is appropriate for Debian in general. In one
> context, the Bible would be considered religious, in another,
> historical, another literary, and another still, philosophical. Is
> "religious" a useful category?
> 
> But within the specific context of Ichthux, we could certainly have a
> top-level menu for Ichthux material, with submenus beneath. Thus:


Whatever use people do of it, the Bible is still a religious text, and a 
Bible study tool will always be put in the Religions part of a library or a 
book store. Why would it be different on Debian? When an historian or a 
philosopher wants to study the Bible, they know they will have to go to the 
religious section to find it, and it's quite ok...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/ichthux-devel/attachments/20050411/bfba927a/attachment.html


More information about the Ichthux-devel mailing list