[bt-devel] Re: Two messages about binary packages

[Jeremy Erickson]

(Greg wrote)
> I would appreciate if the gentleman who is looking for other RPM-based
> distros wouldn't mind making a CentOS/RHEL set of RPMs. It *should* be
> possible just to make one set of RPMs, since CentOS is supposed to keep
> itself up2date along with the latest releases of RHEL sources. Having those
> available (and Sword RPMs for all these distros too?) would be a really nice
> feature for those of us who use it because of it's impressive laptop support
> :-P.
> --Greg

I can go ahead and do that.  I can probably start the download tonight (as 
we're supposed to limit our bandwidth usage during peak hours).  Should I do 
CentOS 3 and 4, or just one or the other?  I don't have access to RHEL, so 
hopefully CentOS should be binary compatible as advertised.

(Joachim wrote)
> BTW, is is possible to offer bibletime-i18n packages for fc3 and fc4 as 
well? 
> That package contains the translations. That would be awesome.
> We got a spec file in bibletime-i18n, but I dont know how well that works.

I will go ahead and do that.  The 1.5.1 version number on the download site 
threw me off.  Now I see that it is labeled as "1.5.X".  I should have time 
later today or tomorrow.

BTW, would it make things easier if my account had the priveleges to upload 
the files directly?  My SF username is jerickson314.

-Jeremy Erickson