[bt-devel] problems

[Troy A. Griffitts]

> > Martin@marten:~ > la /etc/sword.conf
> > -rw-r--r--   1 root     root           36 Oct 31 15:55 /etc/sword.conf
> > Martin@marten:~ >
> 
> Weird, it looks ok.
> Have you acess to /etc ?

Martin,
	In your sword source, cd to examples/cmdline, and do a make clean, then
make.  run the simple search example with a bogus module name and see if
SWORD itself is having troubles, or if it's something with bt.

./search asdf asdf

This should say something like: no such module: asdf, available modules:
KJV	King James Version
WEB	World English Bible

etc.

Let me know if SWORD is having troubles finding it's modules and we'll
see if we can hunt this down.


	-Troy.




> 
> > > The error message says that no modules are found, the page for the error
> > > message is also not found :(
> > > Please backup your BibleTime config files and test without them.
> >
> > no change.
> 
> Mmh, it's hard for me to find the bug because everything is working here fine.
> 
> > > What's are values of $KDEDIRS, $KDEDIR and $KDEHOME?
> >
> > KDEDIR=/opt/kde
> > KDEDIRS=/opt/kde
> > KDEHOME is not defined
> >
> > it worked before :((
> 
> When did the bugs occur (especially the module problem) ?
> I overloaded the SWMgr::Load() function in CSwordBackend which doesn't quit
> anymore. The does shouldn't occur.
> 
> > > Hm, I do not see where the error  is.
> > > I updated CVS so the shared libs ahev no correct names
> > > (libbibletime_backend.so and libbibletime_swordbackend.so).
> > >
> > > Are you using latest Sword?
> >
> > yes. If cvs is recent enough :)
> 
> Probably :)
> 
> > > Sorry for all the trouble I made, I have to improve the installationa and
> > > configuration things.
> 
> > No problem. I am not able to help with programming at the moment, so I can
> > help with testing. If I will not make it, many others will have problems
> > also. So we should find a solution.
> 
> Yes, testing is OK.
> I'm used to be the only coder ;)
> 
> > Another suggestion: default configure to --enable-shared, so that users do
> > not need to type it.
> 
> I'll have a look at this.
> 
> --Joachim