<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font face="FreeSerif">I'm trying to figure out why I can't get
Bishop and AndBible to see the same module set.<br>
<br>
I've got my modules in (what is perceived as, via File Manager)
"/Internal storage/sword". Now, from an ftp client poking around
the local filesystem, this appears as /storage/emulated/0/sword.<br>
<br>
However, that's somewhat unreal, too, because if I poke upward in
the filesystem far enough, I discover that I can reach /sdcard,
which contains what's seen originally, so that I can refer to
/sdcard/sword. Using a terminal emulator, termux, I learn that
/sdcard is a symlink to /storage/self/primary.<br>
<br>
Well, fine so far, actually: I have my modules in an identifiable
place. On Troy's reference, I find this in Sword bindings:<br>
<br>
static char *SWORD_PATH = "/sdcard/sword";<br>
static char *AND_BIBLE_MODULES_PATH =
"/sdcard/Android/data/net.bible.android.activity/files";<br>
<br>
Termux will let me "cd /sdcard/sword" just fine, or use
/storage/self/primary/sword equivalently.<br>
<br>
So why doesn't AndBible find my modules? It's insisting on
starting from scratch, and simply exits if I decline. For some
reason, it doesn't see (or isn't using) the perfectly acceptable
/sdcard/sword.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, can someone give an acceptable Android UI way to say
the equivalent of<br>
mv /sdcard/sword/mods.d/* /sdcard/</font><font
face="FreeSerif"><font face="FreeSerif">Android/data/net.bible.android.activity/files/mods.d/"<br>
and so forth?<br>
</font></font>
</body>
</html>