<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 07/01/2018 à 10:18, David Haslam a
      écrit :<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:LOL7Fr-ePmlxkhKGukliUE4PSnQYL_n4C9CEOOQ6jVz7wEK91XRfNbjGG5AbTrRiJ6rdItqkp_Hkab56xEcE5oeEJpJkqMUP8cV0o1gvHzM=@protonmail.com">
      <div> Cyrille,</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>Further thoughts...</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>One kludgey way forward is to build two LXXM modules.</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>1. With Joshua-A, Judges-A, etc.</div>
      <div>2. With Joshua-B, Judges-B, etc</div>
    </blockquote>
    About this you give me already an answer for an interrogation, what
    to do with the different versions? Then the best way  is to create
    two different modules? No way to add the different translation in
    the same module?<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:LOL7Fr-ePmlxkhKGukliUE4PSnQYL_n4C9CEOOQ6jVz7wEK91XRfNbjGG5AbTrRiJ6rdItqkp_Hkab56xEcE5oeEJpJkqMUP8cV0o1gvHzM=@protonmail.com">
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>The .conf files About would each need to refer to the other
        module.</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>NB. SWORD does not allow a hyphen in a module name, but the
        low line _ is a valid character.</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div>David</div>
      <div> <br>
      </div>
      <div id="protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Sent from ProtonMail
        Mobile</div>
      <div> <br>
        <div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
          On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 09:06, David Haslam &lt;<a
            href="mailto:dfhdfh@protonmail.com" class=""
            moz-do-not-send="true">dfhdfh@protonmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:</div>
        <blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite">
          <div>Cyrille,</div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
          <div>Even if you build the module from IMP using imp2vs, any
            duplicated verses will be overwritten by the occurrence in
            the second instance.</div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
          <div>The module would thus lose content that exists in the
            source text.</div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
          <div>David</div>
          <div> <br>
          </div>
          <div id="protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Sent from
            ProtonMail Mobile</div>
          <div> <br>
            <div>
              <div> <br>
              </div>
              On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 07:33, Cyrille &lt;<a
                href="mailto:lafricain79@gmail.com" class=""
                moz-do-not-send="true">lafricain79@gmail.com</a>&gt;
              wrote:</div>
            <blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite"> <br>
              <br>
              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à 21:19, David
                Haslam a écrit : <br>
              </div>
              <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:-6TFbnhS8BKw7GuNAk7WhjUH77smBrsYnJ8NTSVdFcUxTGLrSPK_M_Dr_b7S-bEVn--Q3Xr0cGrPV4uH4HDLSjEoqqrCGoclZiza33LqtE0=@protonmail.com">
                <div>Now that you understand that, does this change
                  anything regarding the proposed three new catholic lit
                  av11ns ?</div>
                <div> <br>
                </div>
                <div> <br>
                </div>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
              No because for the Catholic we have not to do a
              "compromise" of different version, all version are the
              same. <br>
              <br>
              <br>
              For LXX, I don't understand exactly what to do with the
              LXXM.imp file. For this reason  I propose to create a new
              module with all the LXX books from Rahlfs version (Or you
              can give me the way to use the LXXM.imp :) ). If someone
              desire to have the Strong and Morpho he can still install
              the "old" module. <br>
              After, if someone can add to the new LXX osis file, strong
              and he can use this new source file. <br>
              <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:-6TFbnhS8BKw7GuNAk7WhjUH77smBrsYnJ8NTSVdFcUxTGLrSPK_M_Dr_b7S-bEVn--Q3Xr0cGrPV4uH4HDLSjEoqqrCGoclZiza33LqtE0=@protonmail.com">
                <div> </div>
                <div> <br>
                </div>
                <div class="protonmail_signature_block">Best regards,
                  David </div>
                <div> <br>
                </div>
                <div> <br>
                </div>
                <div id="protonmail_mobile_signature_block">Sent from
                  ProtonMail Mobile </div>
                <div> <br>
                  <div>
                    <div> <br>
                    </div>
                    On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 20:09, Cyrille &lt;<a
                      href="mailto:lafricain79@gmail.com" class=""
                      moz-do-not-send="true">lafricain79@gmail.com</a>&gt;
                    wrote:</div>
                  <blockquote class="protonmail_quote" type="cite"> <br>
                    <br>
                    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à 20:51,
                      Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : <br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote type="cite"
                      cite="mid:be91c2cf-26a1-f413-9b69-7c62dc8f181e@crosswire.org">
                      <p>Dear Cyrille,</p>
                      <p>Are you taking into account my comment about
                        our v11ns being supersets from multiple Bibles
                        and the comments at the beginning of the LXX
                        v11n?</p>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                    No sorry I missed it! Ok it's clear. I understand
                    well. <br>
                    <blockquote type="cite"
                      cite="mid:be91c2cf-26a1-f413-9b69-7c62dc8f181e@crosswire.org">
                      <pre style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-variant-ligatures: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: 2; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration-style: initial; text-decoration-color: initial; word-wrap: break-word; white-space: pre-wrap;">// This is a compromise versification system, intended to allow encoding of Bibles using a number of slightly varying LXX-based versification systems. In particular, it was produced in consultation with OTs:
// Rahlfs', Swete's, Tischendorf's, &amp; Thomson's editiNOtions
// R. H. Charles' &amp; James H. Charlesworth's anthologies of Apocrypha &amp; Pseudepigrapha
// Henry E. J. Howard's Pentateuch and R. R. Ottley's Isaiah translations from the LXX

// In addition to the LXX OT, the GNT has been included in this system to facilitate production of modern Bibles such as the OSB, which are translated from the LXX but include the NT as well. The following NTs were consulted in producing this versification system:
// Antoniades' Patriarchal GNT and its translation, the EOB
// the NKJV (OSB NT) &amp; NRSV translations

// All of these Bibles &amp; texts should be accomodated by this versification definition without requiring that any extra verses be appended; as a consequence, no Bible will include every verse of this system.

</pre>
                      <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
                      <br>
                      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2018 12:47
                        PM, Cyrille wrote: <br>
                      </div>
                      <blockquote type="cite"
                        cite="mid:77e51b46-505b-52ee-7690-f7b762d54450@gmail.com">
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à
                          20:13, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : <br>
                        </div>
                        <blockquote type="cite"
                          cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
                          <p>These v11ns are not in the sources because
                            we are still researching.  But since these
                            have been double checked to printed
                            editions,</p>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                        I have the printing edition!! And this report is
                        about the printing edition, not about the doc
                        file. But the doc file correspond exactly to the
                        printing edition. <br>
                        <blockquote type="cite"
                          cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
                          <p>I highly doubt whatever 'errors' you see
                            are actually errors in the v11n, but rather
                            a bad source text.  I am sorry for
                            speculating, but I know these v11ns were
                            checked and verified by a second individual
                            against a printed edition and also know
                            there is a ton of low quality texts online
                            which claim to be things which they are not.
                            <br>
                          </p>
                        </blockquote>
                        The check was not good done. <br>
                        <blockquote type="cite"
                          cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
                          <p>These are simply my suspicions without
                            having the time now to put in the research. 
                            I hope you find a way to check and confirm.</p>
                        </blockquote>
                        Then I can confirm this : <br>
                        The current canon_LXX.h and the LXX,rahlfs.h
                        don't match with the printing edition, I have
                        with me. <br>
                        <blockquote type="cite"
                          cite="mid:1796eec6-f4bc-a71c-ae26-80f4d5e89a31@crosswire.org">
                          <p>Troy</p>
                          <p> <br>
                          </p>
                          <br>
                          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2018
                            12:06 PM, Cyrille wrote: <br>
                          </div>
                          <blockquote type="cite"
                            cite="mid:d574636c-c4d5-100e-34a6-ca6b14d5fbc2@gmail.com">
                            <br>
                            <br>
                            <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le 06/01/2018 à
                              18:36, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit : <br>
                            </div>
                            <blockquote type="cite"
                              cite="mid:204237e4-ac68-df7b-0029-653f603ba43f@crosswire.org">
                              <p>Dear Cyrille,</p>
                              <p>I just did a brief diff between the
                                canon_lxx.h and the canon_lxx-super.h I
                                sent you in my previous email, and the
                                differences don't look like anything
                                useful.  I must be mistaken about what
                                this file is.  Have a read of the
                                comments in the file I send and those in
                                the canon_lxx.h included in 1.8.0.  They
                                are very similar, but the *-super.h v11n
                                includes this comment near the end of
                                the header: </p>
                              <p>"This is not intended for critical
                                editions that separately encode variant
                                traditions of Joshua, Judges, Tobit,
                                etc. that are already served by the
                                Rahlfs versification system (q.v.)."</p>
                              <p>I am not sure to what the "Rahlfs
                                versification system (q.v.)" refers, nor
                                the /quod vide/ at the end of the
                                reference.</p>
                              <p>I could possibly refer to the analysis
                                of Rahlfs in the LXX v11n folder I send
                                to you earlier, specifically here, but I
                                am not sure:</p>
                              <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h"
                                  moz-do-not-send="true">http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/canon_rahlfs.h</a>
                              </p>
                            </blockquote>
                            My question is why this v11n are not in the
                            sources? And I compare the Rahlfs.h, it's
                            not good... still a lot of issues. I ready
                            to perform it. Please let me know the good
                            way to help. <br>
                            But it clear for me that for the current
                            source I have, it's not possible to use the
                            current LXX v11n. <br>
                            <blockquote type="cite"
                              cite="mid:204237e4-ac68-df7b-0029-653f603ba43f@crosswire.org">
                              <p>But I do not see any accommodation for
                                alternate traditions in there.  I may
                                need to go search old emails to dig up
                                the discussions on this.</p>
                              <p>Troy <br>
                              </p>
                              <p> <br>
                              </p>
                              <br>
                              <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/06/2018
                                09:36 AM, Cyrille wrote: <br>
                              </div>
                              <blockquote type="cite"
                                cite="mid:2fe6b2d8-bfb9-2b88-30c2-67a756b8aa21@gmail.com">
                                <br>
                                <br>
                                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Le
                                  06/01/2018 à 17:16, Troy A. Griffitts
                                  a écrit : <br>
                                </div>
                                <blockquote type="cite"
                                  cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">Hi
                                  Cyrille, <br>
                                  <br>
                                  Just a few comments which I hope will
                                  clear up a few things. <br>
                                  <br>
                                  The sword-tools SVN repo needs to be
                                  checked out to your computer before
                                  you can run the convert.sh for CCAT.
                                  The repo contains the .jar file you
                                  asked about. You cannot just download
                                  the individual convert.sh script. <br>
                                </blockquote>
                                <br>
                                Ok It's clear. I need to clone it with
                                hg? The user is this from the automatic
                                email send? If it is this email I can't
                                find it again <span
                                  class="moz-smiley-s7"><span>:-</span></span>
                                <br>
                                <blockquote type="cite"
                                  cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">
                                  <br>
                                  SWORD versifications are often a
                                  superset for multiple Bibles. The
                                  SWORD engine provides a facility for
                                  frontends to easily skip empty
                                  entries. Thus, when you discover that
                                  a chapter here or a chapter there has
                                  too many verses, it is probably that
                                  way to support another Bible which has
                                  more verses for that chapter. <br>
                                  <br>
                                  LXX v11n has been researched
                                  extensively by Chris and others. There
                                  are many issues regarding the LXX
                                  which are not easily resolved, e.g.,
                                  Rahlfs providing two textual
                                  traditions of the same book in
                                  parallel with different
                                  versifications. I h research for LXX
                                  in general can be found here: <br>
                                  <br>
                                  <a
href="http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/"
                                    moz-do-not-send="true">http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/versification/lxx_v11ns/</a>
                                  <br>
                                </blockquote>
                                <br>
                                OK but what to do?? Is it possible to
                                use the Rahlfs with osis2mod? Because
                                Rahlfs is not the current one. I have
                                the Rahlfs text. If I use the current
                                LXX v11n with my text I will have really
                                a lot of issues! <br>
                                <blockquote type="cite"
                                  cite="mid:0F41A14C-6286-44A1-8737-B89B414C849F@crosswire.org">
                                  <br>
                                  Hope this helps a bit. <br>
                                  <br>
                                  Troy <br>
                                  <br>
                                  <div class="gmail_quote">On January 6,
                                    2018 9:01:01 AM MST, Cyrille <a
                                      class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                                      href="mailto:lafricain79@gmail.com"
                                      moz-do-not-send="true">&lt;lafricain79@gmail.com&gt;</a>
                                    wrote:
                                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote"
                                      style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;">
                                      <pre class="k9mail">Hello,
Before to work on a new module for the LXX, I decided to verify the
current LXX v11n. And what was my surprise discovering many errors!
Please can you give me the list of the current modules using LXX v11n?
I will propose a new with correction, some books give me worries, like
Esther, which contains a versification in letter, I will make you a
proposal once my verification is finished. I work with the A. Rahlfs
(maybe the current LXX v11n was made with an other ?)

Best regards, Br Cyrille

<hr>
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" moz-do-not-send="true">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
</pre>
                                    </blockquote>
                                  </div>
                                  <br>
                                  -- <br>
                                  Sent from my Android device with K-9
                                  Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</blockquote>
                                <br>
                              </blockquote>
                              <br>
                            </blockquote>
                            <br>
                          </blockquote>
                          <br>
                        </blockquote>
                        <br>
                        <br>
                        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                        <br>
                        <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" moz-do-not-send="true">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page</pre>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                      <br>
                      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" moz-do-not-send="true">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page</pre>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                  </blockquote>
                </div>
                <br>
                <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
                <br>
                <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org" moz-do-not-send="true">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel" moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page</pre>
              </blockquote>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:sword-devel@crosswire.org">sword-devel@crosswire.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel</a>
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>