<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="FreeSerif">On 09/10/2017
06:32 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:refdoc@gmx.net">refdoc@gmx.net</a> wrote:<br>
</font></div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:yuhnmi-4tzv85c0njrs1e1eg0rr1fgt-6lymq3x3t1fm-uijx9i-rr7tot-jw53d4-fyn9ge3tj4k5cj2wqu-444h5k-obh4o3xbknx7-15fo17-jo8ekc-uzc1ml-z24ye3meca9v-eq043uhxxxzfme5ld8.1505082739571@email.android.com"><font
face="FreeSerif">Can you not count for individual Ip addresses
per country?</font></blockquote>
<font face="FreeSerif">Of course I can. I can count, sort, and
summarize anything in the data that you like.<br>
It's entirely a matter of the complexity of the pipeline.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://karl.kleinpaste.org/.../ftp-xiphos-org.ip-data.text">http://karl.kleinpaste.org/.../ftp-xiphos-org.ip-data.text</a> (50+
Kbytes)<br>
Save that and handle it yet further, for whatever other
interesting details you wish:<br>
<br>
cut -f2 ftp-xiphos-org.ip-data.text | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr<br>
654 US, United States<br>
82 PH, Philippines<br>
79 BR, Brazil<br>
69 DE, Germany<br>
58 KR, Korea, Republic of<br>
57 GB, United Kingdom<br>
50 AU, Australia<br>
49 ZA, South Africa<br>
41 CA, Canada<br>
39 RU, Russian Federation<br>
28 MX, Mexico<br>
27 SG, Singapore<br>
22 ID, Indonesia<br>
20 UA, Ukraine<br>
19 CZ, Czech Republic<br>
18 PL, Poland<br>
18 NL, Netherlands<br>
18 FI, Finland<br>
15 NG, Nigeria<br>
14 IN, India<br>
13 GH, Ghana<br>
13 ES, Spain<br>
12 RO, Romania<br>
12 AR, Argentina<br>
11 JP, Japan<br>
11 GT, Guatemala<br>
11 FR, France<br>
10 HK, Hong Kong<br>
10 GR, Greece<br>
9 IT, Italy<br>
9 HU, Hungary<br>
9 CO, Colombia<br>
8 VN, Vietnam<br>
8 MY, Malaysia<br>
7 TW, Taiwan<br>
7 SE, Sweden<br>
7 PT, Portugal<br>
7 NZ, New Zealand<br>
7 IL, Israel<br>
7 CL, Chile<br>
6 TH, Thailand<br>
6 CM, Cameroon<br>
6 BY, Belarus<br>
5 ZW, Zimbabwe<br>
5 VE, Venezuela<br>
5 KZ, Kazakhstan<br>
5 CN, China<br>
5 AT, Austria<br>
5 AE, United Arab Emirates<br>
4 UZ, Uzbekistan<br>
4 SA, Saudi Arabia<br>
4 NP, Nepal<br>
4 NI, Nicaragua<br>
4 NA, Namibia<br>
4 KE, Kenya<br>
4 HR, Croatia<br>
4 EG, Egypt<br>
4 BG, Bulgaria<br>
3 TR, Turkey<br>
3 CR, Costa Rica<br>
3 CH, Switzerland<br>
3 BO, Bolivia<br>
3 BE, Belgium<br>
3 AZ, Azerbaijan<br>
2 ZM, Zambia<br>
2 UY, Uruguay<br>
2 UG, Uganda<br>
2 SK, Slovakia<br>
2 PR, Puerto Rico<br>
2 PG, Papua New Guinea<br>
2 LT, Lithuania<br>
2 KG, Kyrgyzstan<br>
2 IE, Ireland<br>
2 HN, Honduras<br>
2 GU, Guam<br>
2 FM, Micronesia, Federated States of<br>
2 ET, Ethiopia<br>
2 EE, Estonia<br>
2 DO, Dominican Republic<br>
2 DK, Denmark<br>
2 AO, Angola<br>
1 TZ, Tanzania, United Republic of<br>
1 TM, Turkmenistan<br>
1 SX, Sint Maarten (Dutch part)<br>
1 SS, South Sudan<br>
1 RE, Reunion<br>
1 PE, Peru<br>
1 NO, Norway<br>
1 MZ, Mozambique<br>
1 MW, Malawi<br>
1 MM, Myanmar<br>
1 MD, Moldova, Republic of<br>
1 KI, Kiribati<br>
1 JO, Jordan<br>
1 IR, Iran, Islamic Republic of<br>
1 EU, Europe<br>
1 EC, Ecuador<br>
1 CI, Cote D'Ivoire<br>
1 CD, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the<br>
1 BJ, Benin<br>
1 AW, Aruba<br>
1 AM, Armenia<br>
<br>
I had no idea</font><font face="FreeSerif"><font face="FreeSerif">
until today</font> that Filipinos and Koreans were heavy users
(#2, #5).<br>
<br>
If wanted, I can distinguish accessors as Xiphos vs. PocketSword
vs. everything else because Xiphos and PocketSword provide a
valuable InstallMgr ctor password string that appears in the log
for anon requests. (No other apps do this favor, though I
suggested it here years ago.) I can distinguish Filipino Xiphos
users from German PocketSword users. Frankly, a great deal can be
learned, to the point of becoming inappropriately revealing.<br>
</font>
</body>
</html>