<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/11/2015 04:06 AM, Matěj Cepl
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:slrnmdm6rs.oba.mcepl@mitmanek.ceplovi.cz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I think you are right. In case you want to file a bug</pre>
</blockquote>
<font face="FreeSerif">I was beginning to file a bug, but then
looked more closely at the build log.<br>
<br>
In file included from /usr/include/c++/5.0.0/map:60:0,<br>
from ../src/main/modulecache.hh:45,<br>
from ../src/main/modulecache.cc:30:<br>
<br>
Um.<br>
<br>
38 #include <gtk/gtk.h><br>
39 #include <glib.h><br>
40 #include <assert.h><br>
41 #include "main/global_ops.hh"<br>
42 <br>
43 #ifdef __cplusplus<br>
44 <br>
45 #include <map><br>
46 #include <string><br>
<br>
This hasn't gotten as far as my nested maps in modulecache.hh.
It's complaining at the point of <map>'s inclusion.<br>
<br>
Am I misusing this somehow? Has gcc4 been doing me some favor
that gcc5 has stopped doing?<br>
<br>
The further complaints are indeed about ModuleCache::CacheVerse,
so maybe gcc5's idea of line number where a fault occurred is
funky.<br>
<br>
I love puzzles, I hate mysteries.<br>
<br>
--karl</font><br>
</body>
</html>