<div dir="ltr">Gonna self-reply on this one:<div><br><div>Seems that gcc 4.9.0 is fine with that line but swig has upgraded to 3.0.0 which is not. Guess I'll have to file a bug with them.</div></div><div><br></div><div>
--Greg</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Greg Hellings <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:greg.hellings@gmail.com" target="_blank">greg.hellings@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">What's wrong with this line that would cause gcc 4.9.0 to complain where previously it did not?<div>
<br></div><div><div><span style="white-space:pre-wrap"> </span>inline SWBuf &operator >>(unsigned long n) { setSize(length()+n); memmove(buf+n, buf, length()-n); return *this; }</div>
</div><div><br></div><div>Line 362 in swbuf.h</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>--Greg</div></font></span></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>