<html><head></head><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="-webkit-tap-highlight-color: rgba(26, 26, 26, 0.296875); -webkit-composition-fill-color: rgba(175, 192, 227, 0.230469); -webkit-composition-frame-color: rgba(77, 128, 180, 0.230469); ">On Jan 1, 2012, at 1:15 AM, Weston Ruter <<a href="mailto:westonruter@gmail.com">westonruter@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><br></div><div><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">Greetings DM,<div>I'm inquiring about the <a href="http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006/">KJV2006 project</a>:</div><div><br></div><div>1) What Greek text is referenced by the <w> elements' @src attributes. Am I correct in assuming that the numbers in the @src attributes correspond to word positions in the corresponding verses</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Yes. <br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div> in the Textus Receptus? Which digital edition of the TR are you keying off of? Is it the <a href="http://www.crosswire.org/sword/modules/ModInfo.jsp?modName=TR">TR</a> module?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I'm not sure. That work was done as part of the KJV2003 effort. <div><br></div><div>Troy would know. </div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr">
<div><br></div><div>2) I see that the Last-Modified time of the XML sources is Thu, 28 May 2009 21:49:36 GMT. Is this when the latest revisions have been applied?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>This corresponds to the version in the beta repository. </div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div> Are there ongoing efforts to refine the data?</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>As David noted we are cleaning up mistakes. </div><div><br></div><div>It will be released this year. </div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><br>
</div><div>3) Is there a goal to refine the OT morphology to provide @src for the Old Testament linkages to an available Masoretic Text, such as the Westminster Leningrad Codex? I am interested in supporting this.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>Not that I know. It is a great idea. </div><div><br></div><div>There is a goal to have the OT morph codes actually be useful. </div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>
<div><br></div><div>Happy new year!</div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><br>And to you too!</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Weston Ruter<br><a href="http://weston.ruter.net/" target="_blank">http://weston.ruter.net/</a><br><font size="1"><a href="http://twitter.com/westonruter" target="_blank">@westonruter</a> - <a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/WestonRuter#about" target="_blank">Google Profile</a></font><br>
</div><br>
</div></div></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>