[sword-devel] Av11n and coverage

DM Smith dmsmith at crosswire.org
Fri Jan 6 17:49:55 MST 2012

I prefer Scope too. It is a term we already use in JSword to express what the module includes.

In Him,

On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Chris Little wrote:

> On 1/6/2012 1:21 AM, David Haslam wrote:
>> For the new config property, would Scope be a better word than Coverage?
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coverage
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scope
>> David
> I'm somewhat more in favor of Scope, since it is the term used in OSIS for a feature we're copying from OSIS. I don't know that either word is particularly better suited, based on their semantics.
> --Chris
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

More information about the sword-devel mailing list