[sword-devel] CLucene 2

[DM Smith]

On 09/02/2011 12:48 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> So I'm looking at the trouble with building CLucene 2 and the first
> snag seems to hinge around the helper functions we use -
> lucene_utf8towcs and lucene_wcstoutf8 and the like. These are still
> present in CLucene 2, but they are not exposed through a public
> header.  As I see it, we can either choose to add their signatures to
> our own headers when CLucene 2 is detected and move on with it, or we
> can appropriate their entire implementation of the functionality and
> rename it as sword_utf8towcs and the like provided the licenses allow
> us to do so.  Anyone have a firm opinion on the better path to take?

No firm opinion;) I suggest checking with the CLucene folk to see why 
they did that and if they are deprecating the functionality with the 
plan to remove it in a future release.
  -- DM