[sword-devel] SUMMARY TO DATE [load v11n from file]

Konstantin Maslyuk kalemas at mail.ru
Sat Jul 16 13:24:42 MST 2011


I think it would be just a binarized canon header file:

string, string, string, int,
string string, string, int,
. . .

DM Smith <dmsmith �� crosswire.org> писал(а) в своём письме Sat, 16 Jul 2011  
18:07:21 +0400:

> For JSword, I'm planning on having the v11n in external resources. If  
> the performance is not good, then it'll be moved internally. Can we  
> define the format of the file? That way, we won't need to change it if  
> SWORD ever externalizes it.
>
> In Him,
> 	DM
>
> On Jul 16, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>
>> OK, to summarize where we are, for those who haven't read all the
>> details and would like to jump in this weekend on the conversation
>> (Konstantin, please correct me if I've misrepresented your position).
>>
>> I) Konstantin proposed 2 possibly paths and outlined the benefits and
>> drawback for both, favoring #2 (path and initial summary, quoted):
>>
<вырезано>
>> this way work proper without collisions and non-coordination
>>
<вырезано>
>> v11n from module
>>
>>
>> II) I expressed concern about the "no dynamic shared v11ns" aspect of
>> #2, stating that it:
>>
<вырезано>
>> Bibles of differing v11ns to the same content.
>>
>> and stressed the unhappy need for the extra work
>>
<вырезано>
>>
>> so module developer can avoid defining how their Bible maps to all other
>> Bible modules, but instead can say:
>>
<вырезано>
>> how these 5 exceptions should be handled in relation to "Synodal."
>>
>> III) Konstantin clarified/proposed a hybrid system where we still seek
>> to define 'canonical' (no pun intended) internal v11ns, but if an
>> internal v11n doesn't yet exist for a module, then the module developer
>> can provide a private v11n used only for his/her own module.  The
>> primary benefit being that  Primary benefit is that module development
>> can move forward before internal v11n is supported in engine.
>>
>>
>> Troy
>>
>>
>> On 15/07/11 17:50, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote:
<вырезано>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel �� crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel �� crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>





More information about the sword-devel mailing list