[sword-devel] Android SWORD
dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu.com
Thu Sep 2 10:18:38 MST 2010
On 2 September 2010 17:28, Matthew Talbert <ransom1982 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Manfred Bergmann
> <manfred.bergmann at me.com> wrote:
>> I don't know but isn't it contra productive and actually a lot more work to maintain the sources on a variety on source control platforms?
>> We end up having SWORD source trees on Github, Bitbucket and Launchpad and eventually on any other system that will come up.
>> For all of those we need people to maintain the sources otherwise we will have a mess of different sources version and implementations.
>> In my opinion, the main and official sources of SWORD have to be maintained by responsible people from Crosswire.
>> And it has to be clear that Crosswire will have and is in control of the official sources. I don't actually care which source control system is used for that, though I think that Subversion is the greatest common divisor because all other DVCSs can bi-directional access Subversion.
> As far as I know, only Launchpad is being used (other than svn). It is
> quite helpful, because it allows people to publish branches of code
> and work on them together to finish a feature before it is committed
> to sword svn. If there is a proliferation of source control systems
> being used, I'm unaware of it.
Plus on Launchpad it is clearly stated where the upstream svn
repository is. The bzr imports are run every 6 hours for many sword
projects (jsword, sword, xiphos, bibletime). And bzr is fully
compatible with svn, i.e. you can seamlessly commit to svn from bzr if
you have access.
More information about the sword-devel