[sword-devel] Missing svn tags for 1.6.0RC1 and RC2 releases?
eekaikko at mail.student.oulu.fi
Fri Apr 24 21:53:22 MST 2009
Jonathan Marsden wrote:
> Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>> No, we don't tag RCs They are not releases, but release candidates :)
>> We could. Tags are cheap, but why?
> (3) An alpha release is a release. A beta release is a release. And an
> rc release is a release, too -- and a candidate to become an official
> final "golden" release, unless unexpected problems are found in it.
> Not entirely incidentally, here's an example from within your own user
> svn list https://bibletime.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/bibletime/tags
Though BibleTime is not an authoritative example of anything, we follow
the normal conventions. I have never heard that RC wouldn't be a
release. For every project I have ever seen publishing an RC it has been
a "release" which is of course tagged in the vcs.
More information about the sword-devel