[sword-devel] dirent.[ch]: licence/copyright issues
jmarsden at fastmail.fm
Thu Apr 23 23:27:31 MST 2009
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
>>> documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided
>>> that this copyright and permissions notice appear in all copies and
>>> derivatives, and that no charge may be made for the software and its
>>> documentation except to cover cost of distribution.
>> *Free Redistribution*
>> The license of a Debian component may not restrict any party from
>> selling or giving away the software as a component of an aggregate software
>> distribution containing programs from several different sources. The license
>> may not require a royalty or other fee for such sale.
>> Does that go well with "no charge may be made for the software and its
>> documentation except to cover cost of distribution."?
>> I'm not sure this is GPL compatible either.
> Good point. No clue. There have been no replies on debian-legal yet.
Intuitively (which is always a dangerous way to deal with legal wording,
I realize!), the "no charge may be made ... except ..." clause is
clearly a restriction on all parties on selling this software.
I've met this kind of thing before, though I forget what package it was
(!), and I am 99% sure (though I am also not a lawyer!) that this kind
of language pushes code into non-free or metaverse repositories -- that
is, it is not DFSG-free to restrict how much one can charge for selling
In this case, though, I believe this file is only needed for Windows,
since under Linux and *BSD we have /usr/include/dirent.h already.
Therefore, we can simply remove it from the tarball in a get-orig-source
rule. Are there any objections to my doing this?
More information about the sword-devel