[sword-devel] sword library versioning and naming convention question (for packaging)
jtgalyon at gmail.com
Thu Oct 16 08:24:50 MST 2008
I am updating the Ubuntu sword package from 1.5.9 to the current 1.5.11.
However, I noticed that libsword used to be libsword.so.6 whereas now it
This does not 'play' nicely with the shlibs versioning and dependency
system for most linux systems that I am aware of. I have chatted
(shortly so far) with some Ubuntu packagers to help me and they had no
ideas. I checked around in my lib directories and even with ones with
numbers before the .so, had version numbers on the end.
Would it be possible next release to have something like
libsword-1.5.so.11 or similar?
Also, I am hoping someone can help me out with this as far as packaging
One other thing, I asked about changing the name myself to include a
version at the end and they strongly disapproved saying it should be the
same across all Linux systems which does make sense.
More information about the sword-devel