jhphx at cox.net
Sat Nov 29 08:04:02 MST 2008
DM Smith wrote:
> For material that is "out-of-print", I think we should also indicate
> that. For example, our conf's still indicate that Bible Foundation
> should be contacted for corrections and for the source. They point
> everyone to the SWORD project for the authoritative sources. We don't
> have them. We have the artifacts of them: our modules. This reference
> should be fixed.
Please don't point back to BF for corrections or copies. Source is
historical in this case.
More information about the sword-devel