[sword-devel] Why is OSIS preferred? Was Re: usfm2osis.pl
dmsmith555 at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 1 08:38:23 MST 2008
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> "Jonathan Morgan" <jonmmorgan at gmail.com> writes:
>> ThML is also still (I think) used by the greatest percentage of our
>> modules (though that may be changed in the future).
>> Will GBF continue to be supported? I seem to remember that Chris
>> reported lack of GBF support as a missing feature in BPBible, despite
>> the fact that I'm sure that I have heard statements suggesting GBF is
>> very strongly deprecated. How many modules are still GBF?
> A couple shell commands will give useful summaries. Refresh main and
> beta repos in your mod.mgr, then peek in ~/.sword/InstallMgr/*/mods.d.
> for i in plain gbf thml osis ; do
> echo $i `grep -i ^sourcetype=$i * | wc -l`
> Main: Beta:
> plain 2 plain 1
> gbf 49 gbf 0
> thml 163 thml 6
> osis 23 osis 93
There are some modules you have missed: some plaintext and some tei.
Also, some modules in beta have just been released and some will upgrade
etheridge, finney, geralbrecht, gerreinhardt, godsword, heretics,
institutes, noyes, spavnt
The merged numbers will be:
plain 42 - 3 are becoming OSIS and 2 new PlainText
gbf 45 - 3 are becoming OSIS
thml 162 - 4 are becoming OSIS and 3 new ThML
Of the current ThML module, there are 106 glossaries. (These probably would be best to be encoded in TEI.) If we ignore these, since most people find them useless and ignore them and because most front-ends can't do anything useful with them, the number of ThML modules will be:
More information about the sword-devel