[sword-devel] Fwd: GPL and other license related questions
jtgalyon at gmail.com
Sat Jan 26 17:19:57 MST 2008
Chris Little wrote:
> [Forwarding message per request. Sorry, I can't advise how to fix the
> sending problem. --Chris]
> Begin forwarded message:
>> From: Moses McKnight <moses at mcknightinstruments.com>
>> Date: January 26, 2008 3:59:22 PM PST
>> To: chrislit at crosswire.org
>> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GPL and other license related questions
>> Hey Chris, I tried to send this to the list but it bounced with the
>> following error:
>> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host mail.crosswire.org[18.104.22.168]
>> 550-Verification failed for <moses at skytex.net> 550-Unrouteable
>> address 550
>> Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>> Can you send it for me? Or tell me what I need to do to send it?
>> Jason Galyon wrote:
>>> Chris Little wrote:
>>>> The only people who would consider the GPL "freedom destroying"
>>>> are people who only care about their own freedoms and not those
>>>> of others (i.e. selfish people). I don't think we care about
>>>> their interests. We certainly don't have any interest in having
>>>> our work exploited by the selfish, who would like to exploit our
>>>> years of work for their own personal, possibly monetary, gain.
>>> This is full of angst and ignorance. I would expect that of a
>>> child but not a Christian. If you can not develop a frontend (for
>>> example) in whatever OSI approved license you choose then I believe
>>> that is one of the many reasons why people see the GPL as viral and
>>> freedom destroying.
>> I personally don't see the angst in Chris' post. As for his
>> argument I
>> don't want to put words in his mouth but let me expand on it a little.
>> The reason he can rightfully say that the people who would consider
>> GPL "freedom destroying" are selfish and care only about their own
>> freedoms is this: They think they should have the right (freedom) to
>> someone else's software (time and labor) without recompense or
>> restriction, but the people who wrote the software should not have the
>> right or freedom to receive a recompense or place a restriction on
>> work. This is the essence of slavery - someone else getting to use
>> time and labor any way want without recompense.
>> Furthermore, to call the GPL viral is a misnomer at best and really
>> indicative of the selfish attitude mentioned above. If you don't like
>> the license, don't use the software licensed that way. Quite simple.
>> Nothing "forces" you to use the software. Your software is completely
>> unaffected by the GPL if you don't use GPL software in it, and the GPL
>> cannot possibly "infect" your software. You must purposely use GPL
>> software in your software in order to affected by it, therefore the
>> cannot be accurately called a "virus". To do so is what I would
>> of a child and not a Christian :-) I would also say that the only
>> people I have seen that call the GPL a virus and freedom destroying
>> either companies or individuals who want to use GPL software in their
>> own commercial software and don't like the license.
>>> Some look for the good of all and see GPL as not the best method to
>>> reach those ends.
>> You may not intend to but the way this is worded gives the subtle
>> implication that those who use the GPL are not looking for the good
>> of all.
>>> Again, there are other licenses out there and if you are forced to
>>> only use GPL then read that again and notice the word "FORCE".
>>> Lets try and be civil and take the rhetoric out.
>> As I mentioned above, no one is "forcing" anyone to use the GPL. If
>> don't like it, don't use the software. No one is "forcing" you to use
>> the software either. That's some of the rhetoric you mention...
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel at crosswire.org
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
More information about the sword-devel