[sword-devel] Version 1.5.2
nospam+sword-devel at joachim-ansorg.de
Mon Oct 17 04:42:10 MST 2005
thanks a lot for preparing the fc3 nd fc4 packages! That's really helpful and
will make the installation possible for a lot new users.
BTW, is is possible to offer bibletime-i18n packages for fc3 and fc4 as well?
That package contains the translations. That would be awesome.
We got a spec file in bibletime-i18n, but I dont know how well that works.
> I know that Packman hasn't updated from 1.5.1 to 1.5.2, either. Because
> the release is so new, however, they may have just not had time to build.
I think packman will do the update in the next few days.
> other distros would be useful? Should I do SuSE? (I already have DVDs or
> DVD ISO images for 9.0-9.3, and can easily download 10.0) This wouldn't be
> difficult, but if Packman already has it taken care of, then to do so would
> be pointless. Mandrake/Mandriva may not be difficult, since it is also an
> RPM distro. Would there be a point to doing FC2 or FC1 builds, or are they
> too old?
Brook Humphrey usually did the Mandrake packages, but I think the last ones
were for 1.4.1. And I haven't been in contact with him for a while now.
Does anybody know if 1.5.x is in available in Mandriva contribs? If that is
not the case we should probably offer those as well.
> Debian and Ubuntu are APT-based and use dpkg for what I would be doing. I
> don't think I have time to learn a new system to get those working. You'd
> probably be best getting someone who can add the packages to the official
> repository for those distros, anyway.
Daniel Glassey does the official Debian packages. An ubuntu package is
probably not difficult with the debian rules of his packages. Perhaps I can
find the time for that.
I guess further discussion about the packages is best in bt-devel.
<>< Re: deemed
More information about the sword-devel