[sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

Martin Gruner sword-devel@crosswire.org
Sun, 2 Mar 2003 20:59:15 +0100


Ah. So when you compiled it static, it did work as expected, is that right? 
Only when compiling a shared sword lib it failed?

I must admit that my skills are not enough to help you further. Maybe somebody 
else could help here.

Martin

Am Samstag, 1. März 2003 18:52 schrieb Darin Duphorne:
> I think it's not linked, because it's static.  The only way I could get
> it to run was to configure the Makefile with --disable-shared.  Should
> I re-compile with defaults and send the output to you again, or is
> there no point?  I don't think those other libs have been touched in a
> while.
>
> On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 11:38  AM, Martin Gruner wrote:
> > Well, if this is really what ldd is on other systems, then your log
> > shows that
> > sword is not linked to. So the problem must be something else? Did you
> > recently upgrade these 2 libraries on your system? Did the headers
> > also get
> > upgraded? I don't really understand why recompiling should not fix the
> > issue.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Am Samstag, 1. März 2003 00:31 schrieb Darin Duphorne:
> >> EUREKA!!!  otool -L is a substitute for ldd.
> >>
> >> [ibook:~/source/sword] darin% otool -L /usr/local/bin/diatheke
> >>
> >> /usr/local/bin/diatheke:
> >>          /usr/lib/libz.1.1.3.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
> >> current
> >> version 1.1.3)
> >>          /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0,
> >> current version 63.0.0)
> >> [ibook:~/source/sword] darin%
> >>
> >> On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 02:23  PM, Martin Gruner wrote:
> >>> This might not be sword related. Please send the output of
> >>> "ldd diatheke".
> >>>
> >>> mg
> >>>
> >>> Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 15:18 schrieb Martin Gruner:
> >>>> Could you do an "ldd diatheke"?
> >>>>
> >>>> mg
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> sword-devel mailing list
> >> sword-devel@crosswire.org
> >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel