[sword-devel] Paul's epistles
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 21:00:05 -0500
On Saturday 12 January 2002 20:14, you wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "chris" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <email@example.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 1:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Paul's epistles
> > On Saturday 12 January 2002 12:39, you wrote:
> > > > I see that the default for Sword is that "Paul's Epistles"
> > > > includes Hebrews. Does anybody seriously believe that Hebrews
> > > > is by Paul?
> > >
> > > We also call the books of the Pentateuch 1-5 Moses respectively in many
> > > of our localized book names. Does anybody seriously believe that the
> > > Pentateuch was written by Moses and is not an amalgam of four major
> > > sources?
> > Yes, It would seem even jes-s supposedly did.
> > > We include Daniel with the prophets, despite his exclusion from that
> > > group in the Hebrew canon itself. Does anybody seriously believe that
> > > Daniel lived during the Babylonian exile, despite his apparently not
> > > knowing that the Medes never ruled Judea and the fact that he
> > > apparently can't decide whether he prefers Hebrew or Aramaic, then
> > > forgets them both and starts writing in Greek around the end of his
> > > composition?
> > The text is in Hebrew/Aramaic. The names of the three musical instruments
> > are greek words (not written in greek).
> > Not to start any arguments but...
> > Why call matthew, matthew when it wasn't written by him
> > same with luke, mark, john.
> > Why believe a word john writes at all when there was never any custom to
> > release a prisoner at pesach by Pilate?
> Apparently someone has a hard time believing the fundamental truth in 2 Tim
> 3:16, that all scriptures is inspired by God. I'm sure it will do you good
> if you spend some more time with the Bible that with litterature
> considering criticism.
No, I have no problem believing that statement considering the very
"Scripture" it refers to has nothing to do with any book in the xian bible
but with the Torah. The "nt" was not in existance at that time. I suppose you
think that paul used a copy of the KJV NT to teach?
The "literature considering criticism" you refer to is called History.
As this is the sword-devel list I do not wish to get into a argument over
this. I was merely pointing out some well known facts.
8:53pm up 32 days, 4:43, 10 users, load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01