[sword-devel] Unicode - was 1.52 & a request
Tue, 15 May 2001 21:34:11 +1000
"Don A. Elbourne Jr." wrote:
> Paul Gear wrote:
> > A bit scary that something so long established as Hebrew would
> > not even have a
> > full set of diacritical marks in Unicode, eh? I wonder what
> > others do for BHS?
> BibleWorks and Logos both use their own TrueType fonts.
Rick Brannan has told me in the past that Logos _already_ use Unicode
internally. The fonts are not really the issue - i'm just curious as to how
they could do so when some characters are apparently missing. Which ones are
> The next version of
> Logos will be shifting to Unicode, but I don't know what their plans are for
> the moment considering the holes in Unicode Hebrew support.
Well, we know how good Titus' fonts are at present. Love those ugly fonts and
square boxes for accents! :-]