[sword-devel] Multimap (was: I want to port the API to Java)
Sun, 09 Dec 2001 23:31:37 +1100
> Many Java and C compilers are not freely distributable in source form
> either, yet we support them... Okay, that's not the same thing,
As you say, it's not the same thing.
> but it seems we're in the business of spreading the Gospel of Christ
> not necessarily the Gospel of Open Source. My point is open source in
> all its glory is still just a means to an end, not necessarily the end
> in and of itself.
As you said, Open Source IS a means to an end. That's why you are using
it, because it IS an effective means. Closed source is not such an
> If an external library does it faster and more compact than we could
> on our own, I don't see anything against it, especially if we can
> distribute it ourselves and the end user doesn't even have to know.
Will you see something against it when Objectspace pulls it and you are
left high and dry?
> If it adds bloat and useless features we could avoid by doing it
> ourselves, then lets do it ourselves if feasible. Also if it's a very
> large and complicated project and a moving target and in a field where
> we're not all experts and something we really need (like Unicode,
> though Java already has that), let's use an external library too if
> there's a good one. It's your call.
> As always, I only speak my own opinions, the only ones I have... ;o)
> At 11:28 PM 12/8/2001 +1100, Chris wrote:
>> So you are comfortable that Sword will depend on a library that you
>> have no right to distribute
>> in source form?
>> And if ObjectSpace ever pulled the library, you would have to, for
>> all practical purposes,
>> stop using it? Seems a high price to pay for something so minor as a
>> collection class.
>> Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>>>> I just read the jgl licence. It's _not_ a free or open-source licence.
>>> Not sure your point. It is freely distributable by us in binary form,
>>> and I'm not trying to gain the world for RMS, but for Christ.