Tue, 07 Aug 2001 16:57:30 -0700
At 01:57 PM 8/7/2001 -0400, Mike Sangrey wrote:
>...allow any subscriber to post without moderation with the
>exception of the first post or two.
I like that suggestion. Even this list could use some kind of spam blocking.
>...and then there is the occasional...well...you know.
After running a BBS for a number of years I do know!
>...it gives great freedom to those who play within
>the rules and helps the moderator(s) manage the list.
I like it.
>...you will need a list charter.
>One reason for the list charter is so the moderator(s) can point to an
>objective rule, quote it, and say, "What you did is not allowed." The
>list charter, in effect, holds the moderator(s) accountable to the
>subscribers and vice-versa. It is, in effect, a way to "submit to one
>another" (Eph. 5:21).
How would the moderators be accountable to the subscribers? If there was a
problem with a moderator what would the subscribers do?
>Hope that helps. God bless.
Thank for the info. And likewise.