[osis-core] language element in header

[Chris Little]

Patrick,

Yes, I think that does a good job of allowing us to maintain consistency 
with DC, yet being clear that RFC 3066 conformance is a recommendation 
not a requirement.

--Chris

Patrick Durusau wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Something along these lines:
>
> The content of the <language> element is recommended to conform 
> to the requirements of RFC 3066 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt)
>
> Patrick
>
> Chris Little wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's the one I mean.
>>
>> My issue is again with consistency.  The type is only constrained to 
>> xs:string, but the prose states that values should conform to RFC 
>> 1766.  Maybe this is consistent and we mean "should" to be only a 
>> recommendation.
>>
>> --Chris 
>