[osis-core] Creation of annotation schema.

[Todd Tillinghast]

As I have thought about annotations, it occurs to me that some
annotations would NOT apply simply to a single reference or a range
reference.  

Question: Should we have a more complex structure for pointing?  

Example:
<annotations>
	<header/>
	<ann>
		<annotationOf>
			<reference osisRef="Ps.1.1"/>
			<reference osisRef="Ps.9.4"/>
			<!-- and/or possibly some other text -->
		</annotationOf>
	</ann>
</annotations>

Todd
> -----Original Message-----
> From: osis-core-admin@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:osis-core-
> admin@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Todd Tillinghast
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 1:41 PM
> To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> Subject: [osis-core] Creation of annotation schema.
> 
> All,
> 
> Unfortunately, we cannot derive ComplexTypes in an annotation schema
> from ComplexTypes in osisCore.1.1.1.xsd because there are explicitly
> named ComplexTypes in osisCore.1.1.1.xsd.  All elements are created
with
> "in line" ComplexTypes rather than with separate and explicitly
declared
> and named ComplexTypes.
> 
> 
> Here is what I was hoping to do.
> 	<xs:redefine schemaLocation="OSISCore.1.1.1.xsd">
> 		<xs:simpleType name="annotations">
> 			<xs:restriction base="osisCorpus">
> 				... not allow <osisText> and add in
> <annotations>...
> 			</xs:restriction>
> 		</xs:simpleType>
> 		<xs:simpleType name="ann">
> 			<xs:restriction base="note">
> 				.. no real change other than to require
> the osisRef ..			</xs:restriction>
> 		</xs:simpleType>
> 	</xs:redefine>
> 
> As a result of having no ComplexTypes in osisCore.1.1.1.xsd I have
taken
> the more the other route to get the same result.
> 
> See the attached schema.
> 
> I also enumerated osisAnnotations as {A, B, C} and that should be
> changed to a more meaning full list.  Please submit suggestions.
> 
> I used the name "ann" for the element that parallels "note" to avoid
> confusion because "annotation" is a SimpleType in osisCore.1.1.1.xsd
and
> is defined in XML Schema.  Suggestions on a better name?
> 
> Just a rough version but it may do the job.
> 
> Todd
> 
>