[osis-core] notesPartsOSIS?

Todd Tillinghast osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
Fri, 12 Apr 2002 13:15:22 -0500


If we find a difference and NEED for it after OSIS_10 then it can be
dealt with then.  For now I'm with you.  Let's get this ship ready to
sail!

Todd

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org [mailto:owner-osis-
> core@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Patrick Durusau
> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 7:47 AM
> To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> Subject: Re: [osis-core] notesPartsOSIS?
> 
> Todd,
> 
> I really don't think there is a principled difference between a
noteType
> on a note and a notePart. Actually notePart is like a subnote and as
> such, I think should be able to bear the noteType attribute.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> Todd Tillinghast wrote:
> 
> >If we think that the enumerated list for types for <notePart> and
<note>
> >are the same set then we should leave it alone.  In my TEV document I
> >used several x- types for <notePart> that may not be what we intend
for
> ><note>.
> >
> >Here is the list of types I am using exclusively for <notePart> and
not
> >for <note>:
> >x-link
> >x-reading
> >x-content
> >x-refText
> >
> >This is just a statement of what I did when encoding and that I did
find
> >a difference between the type of <note> and <notePart>.  But I am NOT
> >attached to there being different types for <note> and <notePart>.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >Todd
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> >[mailto:owner-osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org] On Behalf Of Patrick
> >Durusau
> >Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:20 AM
> >To: osis-core@bibletechnologieswg.org
> >Subject: [osis-core] notesPartsOSIS?
> >
> >Todd,
> >
> >
> >>9) Fixed the typo in noteTypePart to be the union of notePartsOSIS
and
> >>attribute extension rather than notesOSIS
> >>
> >
> >When I search for notePartsOSIS, it should occur in the union
statement
> >and somewhere else? In other words, the union call is a joining of
two
> >lists already defined elsewhere. At least in OSISCore_0107.xsd, there
is
> >
> >no other notePartsOSIS. (Besides, I think the union with notesOSIS is
> >correct anyway. ;-)
> >
> >Patrick
> >
> 
> --
> Patrick Durusau
> Director of Research and Development
> Society of Biblical Literature
> pdurusau@emory.edu
> 
>