Has anyone tried Qt-Creator the Free IDE by Qt for Qt development?<br><cite><a href="http://www.qtsoftware.com/developer/">www.qtsoftware.com/developer/</a><b>qt</b>-<b>creator<br><br></b></cite><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Greg Hellings <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:greg.hellings@gmail.com">greg.hellings@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Chris Little <<a href="mailto:chrislit@crosswire.org">chrislit@crosswire.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Matthew Talbert wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> into the system. Especially if what Matthew says is true and support<br>
>>> for those is already excluded based on using Visual Studio 2005, then<br>
>>> it's even more work for me to find a version of Studio that will<br>
>>> build, possibly buy it for a large sum of money if it's not one of the<br>
>>> two versions I already own, then learn how to build binaries that will<br>
>>> work on both 9x and NT families of Windows.<br>
>><br>
>> I believe 2005 is OK (though I've never tested). AFAIK, the link I<br>
>> mentioned was for 2008.<br>
><br>
> FWIW, the current free version of VS is Visual Studio 2008 Express, and it<br>
> would be nice to allow people to develop using a free compiler/IDE.<br>
<br>
</div>My bad, I have been using the commercial version of 2008 -- we get<br>
both 2005 and 2008 through the University's student licensing<br>
agreement with Microsoft. My build was done with 2008, which further<br>
reduces the chance of getting binaries to support 9x.<br>
<br>
--Greg<br>
<div class="im"><br>
><br>
> If it's especially desirable, we could revive the VS6 projects for Sword,<br>
> etc., but I don't think I would make the effort to support 9x at this point.<br>
<br>
</div>I know it wouldn't do me any good, since I don't have VS6 nor access<br>
to it that I'm aware of. But if someone feels a die-hard desire to<br>
build with VS6...<br>
<br>
Ideally we'd get MinGW working, as many people have said, then we'd<br>
have a truly free development system, but the CLucene people would<br>
have to be consulted on that, or at least someone who feels like<br>
tracking down the bugs I've observed in those headers with the MinGW<br>
and other GCC-for-Windows compilers I've tried.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--Greg<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
><br>
> --Chris<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> bt-devel mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:bt-devel@crosswire.org">bt-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel" target="_blank">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
bt-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:bt-devel@crosswire.org">bt-devel@crosswire.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel" target="_blank">http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/bt-devel</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>