<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/18/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeremy Erickson</b> <<a href="mailto:jerickson314@users.sourceforge.net">jerickson314@users.sourceforge.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
(Greg wrote)<br>> I would appreciate if the gentleman who is looking for other RPM-based<br>> distros wouldn't mind making a CentOS/RHEL set of RPMs. It *should* be<br>> possible just to make one set of RPMs, since CentOS is supposed to keep
<br>> itself up2date along with the latest releases of RHEL sources. Having those<br>> available (and Sword RPMs for all these distros too?) would be a really nice<br>> feature for those of us who use it because of it's impressive laptop support
<br>> :-P.<br>> --Greg<br><br>I can go ahead and do that. I can probably start the download tonight (as<br>we're supposed to limit our bandwidth usage during peak hours). Should I do<br>CentOS 3 and 4, or just one or the other? I don't have access to RHEL, so
<br>hopefully CentOS should be binary compatible as advertised.</blockquote><div><br>
I would imagine that people who are in enterprise settings (and
myself with the laptop) don't always update very often for
stability's sake. It is my guess that building for 3 and 4 would
be a good plan, but it all depends on how much time you want to put
into it. And yes, in my experience builds for RHEL and CentOS
have been binary compatible so far. Thanks for your work!<br>
</div></div><br>
--Greg<br>