mvnForum Homepage Welcome Guest  | Guest Setting  |  Register  |   Login
  Search  
Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Online  | User List  | Help


»

No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3827 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
Male mispunt
Stranger
Member's Avatar


Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Post Count: 3
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Standard gui

Why aren't you using a standard gui insteasd of three diffrent ones(win/kde/gnome)?
isn't it more easy to have just one crossplatform gui?
[Apr 26, 2004 7:03:34 AM] Show Printable Version of Post    View Member Profile    Send Private Message [Link] Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Male Osk
Developer
Member's Avatar


Joined: Sep 17, 2003
Post Count: 211
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Standard gui

You forgot MacOS X, the web front ends, the handheld front ends, etc.

There are three answers to your questions:
1) People are free to (and do) develop according to their own interests and tastes. The developers of BibleTime, GnomeSword, and The SWORD Project for Windows are not the same people. They're distinct teams working on independent projects that all use a common API: SWORD.

2) Crossplatform interfaces do not necessarily serve anyone well. They are forced to meet the lowest common denominator of each platform they serve. That means the software for each platform is poorer than it might have been if it had been custom written for that platform and had been allowed to take advantage of platform-specific features.

3) There aren't any decent crossplatform frameworks. Qt is very expensive and incompatible with our license on Windows & Mac. wxWindows is being looked into, but has some deficiencies, compared to KDE/Qt, for example.
[Apr 26, 2004 12:44:24 PM] Show Printable Version of Post    View Member Profile    Send Private Message [Link] Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Male mispunt
Stranger
Member's Avatar


Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Post Count: 3
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Standard gui

You forgot MacOS X, the web front ends, the handheld front ends, etc.

Yes I rememberd me when I had post it, and I forgot to change it.

2) Crossplatform interfaces do not necessarily serve anyone well. They are forced to meet the lowest common denominator of each platform they serve. That means the software for each platform is poorer than it might have been if it had been custom written for that platform and had been allowed to take advantage of platform-specific features.

I do not agree with this, it is possible to put platform independand code into the source (example: #ifdef win32)

3) There aren't any decent crossplatform frameworks. Qt is very expensive and incompatible with our license on Windows & Mac. wxWindows is being looked into, but has some deficiencies, compared to KDE/Qt, for example.
That could be trough, I don't really know, but I understnad it now
cool
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by mispunt at Apr 27, 2004 12:18:01 AM]
[Apr 27, 2004 12:17:16 AM] Show Printable Version of Post    View Member Profile    Send Private Message [Link] Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Show Printable Version of Thread  Post new Thread